Analyzer should remove support for ?id operator

[gbracha]

Per spec. 0.41, this construct has been dropped.

[gbracha]

Se issue #10466

[bwilkerson]

Set owner to @bwilkerson.
Added this to the M6 milestone.

[bwilkerson]

Analyzer is now producing an error for this construct.

[bwilkerson]

Issue #11565 has been merged into this issue.

[bwilkerson]

Removed this from the M6 milestone.
Added this to the M7 milestone.

[jwren]

M7 -> M8

---

Removed this from the M7 milestone.
Added this to the M8 milestone.

[bwilkerson]

Removed this from the M8 milestone.
Added this to the Later milestone.

[danrubel]

Needs to be fixed by 1.0

---

Removed this from the Later milestone.
Added this to the M8 milestone.

[gbracha]

Yes, please! I've been asked to raise bugs of language compliance to a higher priority.

---

Removed Priority-Medium label.
Added Priority-High label.

[bwilkerson]

The analyzer is fully specification compliant. The analyzer is still parsing and producing AST nodes for this operator, but it is producing the required errors. The only effect of it's behavior is that it recovers better if it finds code that still tries to use this operator. This issue is still open so that I don't forget that we might want to go back and do some code clean-up after 1.0.

---

Removed this from the M8 milestone.
Added this to the Later milestone.
Removed Priority-High label.
Added Priority-Medium label.

[gbracha]

Ok, but I question whether in 1.0 we should be giving messages about constructs that are not in the language. I understand you are trying to be helpful when processing at older code by giving the deprecated message, but I think it needs to go before 1.0.

[bwilkerson]

Removed the owner.
Removed this from the Later milestone.
Added this to the 1.4 milestone.

[jwren]

https://codereview.chromium.org/268673006/

---

Added Started label.

[jwren]

Set owner to @jwren.
Added Fixed label.