Skip to content

Maintenance: add Idempotency utility to unit tests #1159

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
dreamorosi opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Maintenance: add Idempotency utility to unit tests #1159

dreamorosi opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
duplicate This issue is a duplicate of an existing one idempotency This item relates to the Idempotency Utility internal PRs that introduce changes in governance, tech debt and chores (linting setup, baseline, etc.) rejected This is something we will not be working on. At least, not in the measurable future

Comments

@dreamorosi
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Given that #1110 is now merged it's now a good time to add the new utility to the unit testing ran at different points of the dev lifecycle.

Additionally, there were some inconsistencies in the package.lock dependencies that prevented some other CI processes from completing successfully (example of failed run).

Why is this needed?

To increase confidence in the code to be merged and to prevent regressions.

Which area does this relate to?

Tests, Idempotency

Solution

See linked PR

Acknowledgment

@dreamorosi dreamorosi added internal PRs that introduce changes in governance, tech debt and chores (linting setup, baseline, etc.) idempotency This item relates to the Idempotency Utility labels Nov 11, 2022
@dreamorosi dreamorosi added this to the Idempotency - Beta release milestone Nov 11, 2022
@dreamorosi dreamorosi self-assigned this Nov 11, 2022
@dreamorosi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this in favor of #1100

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING ⚠️

Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.
If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.

@dreamorosi dreamorosi added duplicate This issue is a duplicate of an existing one rejected This is something we will not be working on. At least, not in the measurable future labels Nov 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue is a duplicate of an existing one idempotency This item relates to the Idempotency Utility internal PRs that introduce changes in governance, tech debt and chores (linting setup, baseline, etc.) rejected This is something we will not be working on. At least, not in the measurable future
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant