-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
Any chance to support legacy modesetting as an option for some SBC like nanopi fire3 #97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
nanopi3_flutter-pi_log.txt Here is the log when testing commit 3e3c53ed85c30331a6c0ba2af349223654caa5dd |
landed in master #101 |
Hi ardera, BR, |
That's good to know, I have Mesa 19.3.2 installed on my Pi and I experienced some graphics bugs when using HDMI. Maybe that's related to the mesa version as well |
Hi ardera, BR, |
HI ardera,
Thank you for helping solve the #86, I have some other SBCs want to use you flutter-pi. I remember in that CR, you mentioned it's possible to implement a fallback to legacy modesetting, if atomic modesetting is not supported.
My nanopi fire 3 is based on nexell cpu with ARM mali 400MP2. The distributions for it are all based on Kernel 4.4.
I have recently upgrade it to kernel 5.4 (only to enable the hardware rendering support for mali GPU), now everything works fine. I can run kmscube. But the kernel driver for DRM is using legacy rendering. I have you use your old version in May before atomic modesetting is merged. Is it possible you let your latest code to optionally run legacy modesetting for these SBCs,
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: