Skip to content

Conversation

@devin-ai-integration
Copy link

Link to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/872e7bbcb3ef4b01adc6fe5e7fc5e269

This PR introduces a GitHub Actions workflow for running tests and linting, and updates our existing test mocks to match the OpenAPI schema.

Changes:

  • Add GitHub Actions workflow for running tests and linting
  • Create comprehensive test suite with schema-aligned mocks
  • Add authentication tests for JWT validation
  • Update endpoint paths to match OpenAPI schema
  • Add tests for optional parameters and error cases

The test mocks have been carefully aligned with the OpenAPI schema requirements, ensuring all required fields are present and response formats are correct. The workflow will run on all PRs to main branch.

- Add GitHub Actions workflow for running tests and linting
- Create comprehensive test suite with schema-aligned mocks
- Add authentication tests for JWT validation
- Update endpoint paths to match OpenAPI schema
- Add tests for optional parameters and error cases
@devin-ai-integration
Copy link
Author

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR. Add "(aside)" to your comment to have me ignore it.
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

@codeant-ai
Copy link

codeant-ai bot commented Dec 29, 2024

Pull Request Feedback 🔍

🔒 No security issues identified
⚡ Recommended areas for review

Code Smell
The test_create_jwt_invalid_payload and test_create_jwt_invalid_secret functions have repetitive code for testing invalid inputs. Consider refactoring to reduce redundancy.

Code Smell
The test_error_responses function tests multiple scenarios within a single test case, which can make it harder to identify which scenario failed. Consider splitting these into separate test cases for clarity.

Comment on lines +39 to +50
def test_create_jwt(sample_payload, sample_secret):
"""Test JWT creation."""
token = create_jwt(sample_payload, sample_secret)

# Verify token structure
assert isinstance(token, str)
assert len(token.split(".")) == 3

# Verify token can be decoded
decoded = jwt.decode(token, sample_secret, algorithms=["HS256"])
assert decoded["sub"] == sample_payload["sub"]
assert decoded["exp"] == sample_payload["exp"]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion: Consider adding tests for edge cases such as payloads with special characters or very large payloads to ensure the create_jwt function handles them correctly. [enhancement]

Suggested change
def test_create_jwt(sample_payload, sample_secret):
"""Test JWT creation."""
token = create_jwt(sample_payload, sample_secret)
# Verify token structure
assert isinstance(token, str)
assert len(token.split(".")) == 3
# Verify token can be decoded
decoded = jwt.decode(token, sample_secret, algorithms=["HS256"])
assert decoded["sub"] == sample_payload["sub"]
assert decoded["exp"] == sample_payload["exp"]
def test_create_jwt(sample_payload, sample_secret):
"""Test JWT creation."""
token = create_jwt(sample_payload, sample_secret)
# Verify token structure
assert isinstance(token, str)
assert len(token.split(".")) == 3
# Verify token can be decoded
decoded = jwt.decode(token, sample_secret, algorithms=["HS256"])
assert decoded["sub"] == sample_payload["sub"]
assert decoded["exp"] == sample_payload["exp"]
# Test with special characters in payload
special_payload = {"sub": "user!@#$%^&*()"}
token = create_jwt(special_payload, sample_secret)
decoded = jwt.decode(token, sample_secret, algorithms=["HS256"])
assert decoded["sub"] == special_payload["sub"]
# Test with large payload
large_payload = {"sub": "user" * 1000}
token = create_jwt(large_payload, sample_secret)
decoded = jwt.decode(token, sample_secret, algorithms=["HS256"])
assert decoded["sub"] == large_payload["sub"]

@devin-ai-integration
Copy link
Author

Closing due to inactivity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant