Skip to content

Full Version History #180

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
techtonik opened this issue Oct 28, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Full Version History #180

techtonik opened this issue Oct 28, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@techtonik
Copy link

There is no information about differences between versions of Swagger. It will be nice to know why a certain version was not sufficient and new speccy appeared.
https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-spec/blob/master/versions/2.0.md#revision-history

@webron
Copy link
Member

webron commented Mar 27, 2016

Parent: #589.

@lornajane
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as outdated and somewhat addressed. Newer versions of OpenAPI specification have transparent change processes and discussion.

@techtonik
Copy link
Author

@lornajane historical info is never outdated. I wouldn't close this issue in case there is still somebody who can fill the gap.

@handrews
Copy link
Member

@techtonik there's no simple reason for a version to be considered in need of updating or replacement- it's the ongoing discussions documented in this repository's issues and PRs that tell that story (and the OAI/moonwalk repository for the next major version). Existing published versions aren't changed once published, so if you really think there are specific things that need documenting, you could file issues requesting documentation of those specifics at the OAI/learn.openapis.org repository.

@techtonik
Copy link
Author

The main reason for Full Version History information in any spec is to have information about how to (back)port tools and data from one version to another. Sometimes you need to backport things to an older spec for some complicated piece of software to do its job.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants