minor clarification for operationId usage in link objects (#1733)

* minor clarification

it's a bit confusing that both the id and the reference are called "operationId", so this tweak makes the text a bit more explicit.

* use right terminology

Co-Authored-By: Mike Ralphson <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Ron <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mike Ralphson <[email protected]>

Author: 3 people

versions/3.0.3.md

@@ -2102,7 +2102,7 @@ solely by the existence of a relationship.
 ##### OperationRef Examples
 
 As references to `operationId` MAY NOT be possible (the `operationId` is an optional 
-value), references MAY also be made through a relative `operationRef`:
+field in an [Operation Object](#operationObject)), references MAY also be made through a relative `operationRef`:
 
 ```yaml
 links: