[Feature Request]: New column for "MCP Server Name" in Global tools/resources etc #506
Description
🧭 Type of Feature
Once we create a "[Gateways/MCP Servers]", under the auto discovered Global Tools/Resources/Prompts, currently it is very difficult to identify the tools from which MCP Server/Gateway. Only way to identify is using URL as shown in the below attachment.
It will be better if you can have a column "Gateway/Server Name" under Global Tools/Resources/Prompts table which maps to the [Gateways/MCP Servers] Tab.
Please select the most appropriate category:
- [*] Enhancement to existing functionality
- New feature or capability
- New MCP-compliant server
- New component or integration
- Developer tooling or test improvement
- Packaging, automation and deployment (ex: pypi, docker, quay.io, kubernetes, terraform)
- Other (please describe below)
🧭 Epic
Title:
Goal: What is the big-picture objective of this feature set?
Why now: Why is this needed? Who benefits?
🙋♂️ User Story 1
As a:
I want:
So that: <some reason / value>
✅ Acceptance Criteria
Scenario: First scenario title
Given some starting state
When an action occurs
Then a result should happen
Scenario: Second scenario title
Given another state
When something else happens
Then another result occurs🙋♂️ User Story 2
As a:
I want:
So that:
✅ Acceptance Criteria
Scenario: Third scenario title
Given a specific setup
When a user performs an action
Then something meaningful happens📐 Design Sketch (optional)
Include a diagram, sketch, or flow (use Mermaid if desired):
flowchart TD
A[Client] -->|POST /completions| B(MCPGateway)
B --> C[Completion Service]
🔗 MCP Standards Check
- Change adheres to current MCP specifications
- No breaking changes to existing MCP-compliant integrations
- If deviations exist, please describe them below:
🔄 Alternatives Considered
List any alternative designs, existing workarounds, or rejected ideas.
📓 Additional Context
Include related issues, links to discussions, issues, etc.