Remove use of before all and switch to before each #2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We probably do not need to use before-all since rspec-steps creates only one it block for all steps - implying before-each block will be called once anyway.
Use of before-each would allow Rails transactional fixtures created inside before block to work out of the box without needing another solution for cleaning the database.
A previous PR also introduced step runner to run steps and that broke access to instance variables. This PR adds test for that behaviour and also fixes the issue by copying the variables from context example to the step runner. Delegation through method missing would not work here.